Looking forward for new Gmail

Mashable mentions that a new Gmail is coming. And I’m eagerly waiting for the new version, because I really, really want these changes:

One of the features is pre-fetching of messages. This means that when you load a page that has a list of messages, Gmail will fetch them in advance, so that they will be available immediately, when you decide to click on one. This goes along with the new JavaScript architecture that’s expected to bring improved performance. There will also be a new contact manager, which will be shared with other Google Apps, including Docs and Calendar.

More Gmail space?

Today I noticed that I have more Gmail space than I used. Here is a screenshot:

Gmail space stats

I don’t check these numbers every day, but I was under the impression that I had somewhere around 3 GBytes just a few days ago. Now I have more than 4 GBytes. I looked through a few news sites, but haven’t noticed any related headlines.

Anybody has any idea? Is it for everybody or just a few random users? Will it stay or will it go? Will we get more? (as you can clearly see, I don’t need more just yet, but I’m still interested).

On avatars

Avatars are those small icons with user photo or some other graphic. Avatars has been integrated with many applications and services in the last few years. ICQ and phpBB forums were among the first high profile, widely used applications, that allowed users to add an image of themselves. Since then everything and anything has avatars – all IMs, most forums, email clients, blogs, you name it. There are even several global avatar services (like Gravatar), where your image is assigned to your email address and then used by other servicse, such as blogs, where you comment and leave your email address.

There are two issues with avatars though. One is technical, another one is social.

The technical issue is that most people who use avatar-enabled services, are not technical enough to find out about the avatars. Or to get their own picture in digital form. So, all these people simply don’t use avatars at all. Their profile pictures appear as anonymous people. Not very useful for the rest of us, who have many people in our contact lists and want some distinction between different entries.

The social thing is with people insecurities and weird sense of humor. Instead of their real pictures, for these or that reasons, they prefer to use something else. Like pictures of cartoon characters, famous brands’ logos, abstract patterns, like green leaves, and stuff like that. Better than nothing, but not good enough. Why? Well, because most people’s creativity (or the time that they allocate for the choice of the proper image) is limited. As a result, I have three people in my contact list with Superman picture, two people with Peugeot cars logo, five people with monkey head shots, four people with … You get it. As a result, having parallel conversations with two or more people with the same avatar becomes complicated, and, way too often, messages are sent to the wrong recipient.

Is there a way to combat it? Probably not. As long as people have the freedom to put whatever they want instead of their image, some of them will choose to do so. And it’s not worth it taking this freedom from them. However, there is a way of stimulation (that’s what I’m doing now, no?). Some applications and services have succeeded more than others in pushing their users to use their own pictures rather than some abstract images.

One of these services is Google (GMail and GTalk). When I compare my contact lists from different IMs, GTalk has the most real phases. So, how did they do it? I am not sure exactly, but there are a few things I can think of.

First of all, is wording. On the settings page, the appropriate entry says “My picture:”. Not my avatar. Not my icon. But my picture. I guess most people understand it literally. My picture is something that shows my face.

Secondly, it’s simplicity. There are several ways a user can add his image. One of them, as mentioned earlier, is by going to Settings page. The link to Settings is right there, at the top of GMail page. And the picture section is again on the front page of the Settings page, not in the “Advanced” tab or somewhere even further. Those people who are more used to setting their IM clients, there is a way too. You can edit your picture through the settings of your IM application, since GTalk works with almost any IM client that supports Jabber protocol.

But the best of all, Google provides the way for non-technical people to get a nice picture of their own. It’s done via recommendation. Here is how it works. I am a GMail user. I am technically enlightened, and I have digital pictures of all the people I know (or almost all of them anyway). My mother is anther GMail user. But she is still learning her ways around the computer. So, I add her to my contacts. Google lets me set a picture for her. I can choose between the picture that I want to see in my contact list and the one she set for herself. I say – show me the picture that I chose. When I upload my favourite picture of my mom, Google asks me if I want to recommend this picture to my mom too, so that she could use it herself. I say “yes, please do”. My mom gets an email, something along the lines of “Leo decided to use this picture for your entry in his contact list. Do you want to use this picture for your profile? Click here for yes.”. That’s it. She does that single click and everyone else who she is a contact of, can enjoy a real face in their contact list. And she probably didn’t even recognize how cool that was.

I wish more applications and services took this approach. It would have made the web so much more personal and recognizable.

On privacy

Yesterday I watched an interesting program on the Discovery about the future of information technology. It was interesting not because I’ve learned a lot of new stuff – I didn’t. It was interesting to see what and how mass media in general and very trustworthy channel like Discovery in particular bring down onto unsuspecting public.

The program was pretty good. It touched on the history of IT, current technologies and trends, and things that await us in the near future. It covered both the technological points (in simple terms) and sociological points (how information technology affects our lives).

One particular piece caught my attention. It was about privacy, with all those mobile phones with built-in camera, CCTV cameras in public places, rapid advances in face recognition technologies, and governments pushing the limits of trust with anti-terrorism programs. One of the interviewed guys said something along the lines of (quoting from memory):”

Basically, there are two extremes when it comes to privacy. People on one side say “forget privacy. It does not exist in The New Age”. People on the other side believe that privacy is the only ultimate thing that we must protect at all costs.

Spot on! I can’t think of the way to present it better.

The question of privacy is up to each individual person. Each one of us has to ask himself or herself how much they care about their own privacy and what are they prepared to do protect it. I thought it about it sometime ago, and I am sometimes re-evaluating my position on this. But so far I haven’t changed it at all.

I am not standing on the extreme of “there is no such thing as privacy in The New Age”, but it’s much closer to me than the other position. Of course, there are some things which aren’t meant for the public eye (or ear for that matter). Personal things. Intimate things. Not everything should be an open broadcast. But, one shouldn’t spend too much time protecting these things.

If someone really wants to find out where you live, when you go on vacation, what is your bank account or passport number, what was the name of your first teacher, or what’s your worst nightmare, there are many ways to do so. And no matter what you do, no matter how hard you try to keep that to yourself, there are always ways to find out.

Why? Because we live in a society. People interact. People know things about people. People think about people. People follow people. People rumor.

You don’t want a bad guy to know where you live? Well, too bad. Because you can hardly control that. Have any of your friends been to your apartment? Do your parents know where you live? Have you bought or rented that place with any sort of paperwork? Do you go outside of your apartment where people can meet you and follow you? Do you… You get the point.

Your bank account and passport numbers are even easier. Because they are harder to change than a rented studio. And because too many people who simply don’t care about your privacy have access to that data.

Your nightmares? Oh well, most of them come from childhood anyway. So chances are at least your parents or siblings know about them. Cause they were with you way before you started caring about your privacy and moved out to live alone in the middle of nowhere. Have you ever heard them telling stories about you to others? I think you did…

Now, you’ll lose plenty of valuable resources (such as your time) working to protect that data. And you still won’t be able to do it to a full degree. And that is not the worse thing yet. The worst thing is that you’ll miss out on so much good that it’s hard to describe it in this already way too long of a post.

Yes, believe it or not (well, I do believe it), but people around you want to do good to you. And the more they know about you, the better are their chances to do that sort of good that you care about, and to delivery that good to you.

For me that solves out the privacy issue. The more ways I have to let people know things about me, the better. If there is a new web service that builds more social interaction based on my passport number, I’ll use it. If there are more CCTV cameras in the streets that solve the traffic problem – I say install them. If I will see more pictures and videos from my friends and family because of the new wave of mobile devices – I say bring it on.

What’s your stand on privacy?