If you enjoyed “Ads gone wrong” from the other day, you’d probably smile at Logos gone wrong.
Via kottke.org.
If you enjoyed “Ads gone wrong” from the other day, you’d probably smile at Logos gone wrong.
Via kottke.org.
Favicons have been around for a few years now. Â But they were mostly used by the browsers – in multi-tab environments and in bookmark managers. Â Recently I’ve noticed the trend to use favicons in web design – next to external links or near the blog comment’s author, etc.
Adding a favicon to the design is a simple thing for the designer. Â But a totally different story for the web developer. Â Favicons can be either dropped into the root folder of the site or linked to from the page’s HTML. Â On top of that, the times of the single favicon.ico format are long gone too. Â These days you could get a GIF or PNG image.
So, how would reliably finda favicon of a site? Â It turns out, you don’t really have to work too hard, since someone has already solved your problem. Â From comments to this article (in Russian) I’ve learned of the Google web service. Â So, all you’ll need to do is this (with whatever domain name that you need):
<img src="http://www.google.com/s2/favicons?domain=mamchenkov.net">
Works and sound good, right? Â Wrong! Â As I mentioned already, there is a way to link to favicons from HTML. Â And this service doesn’t seem to take that into account. Â Well, not to worry anyway. Â There is another one that does – getFavicon. Â This one works in a very similar way, but supports the full URL as a parameter. Â For example:
<img src="http://g.etfv.co/https://mamchenkov.net/wordpress/">
On top of that, you can include properly encoded GET parameters, and avoid browser’s per-server connection limit, by using multiple sub-domains. Â Brilliant, I say.
Today someone mentioned on Facebook that Intel.com website is very well organized and is quite useful.  Being a fan of useful things, I immediately went to check it out.  And I have to say that I am mighty impressed!  Not only it is very organized, providing quick access to information, but it looks really good as well.  Such a combination is rare these days, but it is particularly rare for a large corporation’s website.
Adobe has finally seen the same light Steve Jobs did in 2010 and is now committed to putting mobile Flash player in the history books as soon as possible. Adobe will not develop and test Flash player for Android 4.1 and will now focus on a PC browsing and apps.
But we’ve heard quite a few announcements from Adobe and Google in regards to Flash in the last few month. Â I don’t know about you, but I am practically lost in the controversy. Â Between Adobe releasing the last version of Flash for Linux, Adobe releasing a sandbox version of Flash for Google Chrome and Mozilla Firefox, and Google releasing Google Chrome for Android, I have no clue anymore.
The best I can make of it is that Adobe doesn’t want to support mobile or Linux anymore. Â But Google takes over with its own Flash support integrated into the Google Chrome browser, which Google supports on all desktop platforms, as well as on iOS and Android devices. Â So even without the Adobe we should still be able to access Flash games, porn, and navigation menus.
What do you think? Â Are we about to lose Flash, and if we are, what’s the alternative?
P.S.: As much as I love the idea of HTML5, I don’t think it’s just there yet.