A List Apart : Results of The Web Design Survey 2007

A List Apart, one of the most famous resources for web workers in general, and web designers in particular, has published the findings of its recent Web Design Survey.  More than 30,000 people from all over the world responded, which resulted in a lot of data.  The smart thing that A List Apart did was to hire a professional to analyze all that data.   The results are outstanding – 82 pages of stats, comments, and graphs in a single PDF file.

Some numbers were surprising, others – expected.  Overall, it’s a pretty good picture of the web industry.  I’m sure it will be used as a reference in many studies to come.  Also, the anonymized raw results of the survey are freely available for anyone who wants to dig through them.

P.S.:  Recently I twittered that I don’t have much trust into web professionals, who don’t have their own web site or blog.  It turns out that this more than 70% of survey respondents do have a blog or web site.  Why am I not surprised to find this number in A List Apart survey?

Record anything and replay

I’ve already mentioned before that I’m pretty bored with local radio stations playing the same music over and over and over again.  It’s like they all have a single CD which they load one one Monday morning and then… never eject.  I know all the songs on that CD and their order.

But that’s only half of the story.  Not only they play the same music, but they pre-record everything else – news, weather forecasts, interviews, etc – and they play them all over again and again too.  So, I listen to news while driving to work, and then I listen to exactly the same news in the office.

And the worst part is that it doesn’t matter which radio station I listen to – they all do the same to a certain degree.  And sometimes they overlap with their content too.  Like they play the same music on several radio stations at the same time, or even put on the same interview.

Weird, boring, and annoying…

Best software announcement ever

Open source software is well known for its humor.  There are jokes everywhere – in application names, documentation, command line arguments, source code, etc.  Announcements of new versions aren’t an exception.  But the recent one, for Network Manager 0.7 wins the grand prize from me.  Here is how it starts:

NetworkManager 0.7 is the new Chuck Norris

It will cure cancer. It can divide by zero. It can touch M.C. Hammer.

This just blew me off, although there are a few more int he full text of the announcement.

P.S.: If you don’t get the Chuck Norris reference, here are some Chuck Norris facts.

Project 365 : Status update

One year ago I re-started Project 365.  I was supposed to take at least one picture every day and post it to my Flickr photostream.  I have to say that I failed miserably.  365 days later I only have 91 images to show.  In my defense, they weren’t all taken on a single day, but rather scattered over the last year.

Looking at all those images in one place gives me a lot to think about, and shows clearly how I spent the year.  Here are a few highlights:

  • Participated in Maxim’s potty training.
  • Took a lot of walks with Maxim – mostly in the Municipal park and at Molos promenade.
  • Quit my job and gave my own business a try.
  • Had an excellent New Year’s vacation in the mountains.
  • Sent Maxim to the kindergarten.
  • Got deeper into web design and development.
  • Celebrated a lot of dates – birthdays, anniversaries, public holidays, etc.
  • Participated in the first ever Flickr meet-up in Cyprus.
  • Got myself another job (my own business failed miserably).
  • Traveled to Greece for first ever Greek Blogger Camp.
  • Met a whole lot of interesting people.
  • Re-united with some really old friends.
  • Got a pet.

Of course, if I was involved a bit more with the project, there would have been more pictures, showing other important milestones (such as me getting back to the gym, for example).  But I am satisfied even as things are – it appears that I am living an active and exciting life – something not so obvious without looking at those pictures…

The project is not over.  The goal was to get 365 photos, not to survive another year.  I guess, I’ll have to speed up the project a bit, as it will take me another three years to complete it at this rate.

Real estate property types

For the last few month, I’m working very near real estates industry.  The whole thing is pretty confusing even here, in Cyprus, where it’s in its infancy.  One of the small, but important things that I always feel confused about are property types.  What is a condo?  How is a villa different from a bungalow?  And so on and so forth.

Today I said – “Enough”.  I have to figure this stuff out.  Even if I will forget it all a moment later, I still have to run it through my brain.   But where to get the definitions?  Each web site seems to have its own idea of which types are out there and what each of them means.  Then I suddenly remembered about “define:” Google searches.  I don’t use it very often, but it saved me lots of time on several occasions.  Today is just one such occasion.  Here are the links to Google definitions of the most commonly used property types with my short summary notes:

  •  house – that’s as generic as it can get.  House is just about anything from detached to semi-detached, from village house to villa, through bungalow.
  • apartment – this one is also generic. Usually, this is a block of one or more rooms on a single floor of an apartment building.  There are many variations, of course.
  • flat – this is exactly the same as an apartment.  It’s just another word for it, used in some countries.
  • penthouse – this is a kind of apartment, which is usually at the top of the building.  Often, it is an expensive one,  because of the view and some outdoor space on the roof.
  • studio – a kind of a small apartment.  Think of it as a zero bedroom apartment.  Either it has no bedroom, or its kitchen is somehow integrated into a living room. Often, studio is the cheapest option.
  • condo – short of a condominium.  An apartment in the building, where common areas are jointly owned by all apartment owners in that building.
  • maisonette – a type of apartment.  Usually it spans more than one floor.  Often it has its own entrance, rather than a shared entrance with the rest of the apartment building.
  • villa – usually, the most expensive house.  Often outside the city.  It’s common for a villa to have luxury features like private pool and tennis court.
  • bungalow – often a one floor house, with large veranda.
  • cottage – usually a small, one floor house.  Usually outside the city.  Often has style and charm.

The above list can be generalized to just two types – house and apartment.  As you can see, there are only residential property types.  There are, of course, many more commercial ones, like office, shop, storage, etc. And then, there is land, which separates into land and plots.  And then there is probably something else.   But all that I’ll look at sometime later.  For now I need to sink the above list into my memory.