The amazing Chromium

Being a web worker, I spend a lot of time in my browser. Over the years, I’ve used pretty much everything – from early versions of Netscape and Microsoft Internet Explorer, to text-mode browsers like lynx, links, and w3m, through a whole bunch of Linux desktop browser like Konqueror and Galeon, through mobile browsers, through the latest versions of Opera and Mozilla Firefox. And out of all that variety, Mozilla Firefox was pretty much my only true love browser. It was reasonably fast, free, open source, and with a billion of extensions.

In fact, I accumulated so many extensions that I had to group them into four different Firefox profiles. With all those extensions, I tweaked and tuned my browsing experience to exactly match my needs. And I was happy for a long time. And I couldn’t even think of leaving Firefox for another browser.

Lots of people complained (and still do) about Firefox stability. But I never had any major issues with it. My sessions were stored and backed up automatically, and in those rare cases when the browser crash, I’d just start a new instance and it would automatically open all windows and tabs and bring me back up to speed all by itself.

Most people complained about Firefox performance. Well, I can understand them. It does feel slow and sluggish sometimes, but I was thinking of it as a rather cheap price to pay for all the extensions that I had. Opera, for example, is a much faster browser, but doesn’t have even 1% of the extensions that I use. And that makes it pretty much useless to me. No matter how fast it is.

So I was mostly happy with my browser. I loved it and it loved me back. And then Google released their vision for a modern browser – Chromium. At first, it didn’t even run on Linux, which is my preferred desktop operating system. So I didn’t bother. Then it ran, but people were saying that there were no extensions what so ever. So I didn’t bothered again either.

But the hype was growing, and people were shouting all over the web about how fast and how convenient Google Chrome is. So I just had to try. I thought, I’d download and install it, and use it for a couple of days, just to get my own opinion of it. That was the very beginning of December 2009 and I wasn’t even remote thinking of switching to another browser.

Now that it’s almost middle of February 2010, two and a half month later, I have to confess. I switched to Google Chromium. But that’s not the most surprising thing ever. What’s extremely surprising, at least to myself, is that I switched to Chromium the first day I tried it. Without even knowing.

It was indeed blazing fast. Super-fast. Super-sonic even. Convenient – yes, but it was way faster than I though was even possible for a browser. Extensions were missing, but I was saving so much time with the fastest browser experience ever, that I could do anything my extensions did manually, and would still have plenty of time left. I was shocked and hooked.

And about two weeks later, when I just started to get used to how fast a browser can be, Google opened up their Chromium extensions site. So now I also had some extensions to install. And which I did. And there was no going back.

To this day, Chromium is my default, primary, and mostly preferred browser. It does still have a few shortcomings and things that I’d want different, but all of them are nothing compared to the performance boost that this browser brought into my web life.

Web OS? Yes. Are You Dense? No.

I came across the post titled “A Web OS? Are You Dense?“.  It has a lot of sense in it, but it also asks a question that needs answering.  And I think the answers are quite simple.

So, when your Aunt asks why her 1.2GHz computer isn’t fast enough to run an online word processor that has the same [censored] features as the 1987 version of Corel WordPerfect, you don’t have an answer for her.  There is no justification.

First of all, your Aunt is hardly capable of comparing the features of Corel WordPerfect in 1987 to features of Google Docs in 2009.  So, she probably won’t ask you the question at all.  And even if she will – that’s just for bragging and not for the justification.

Secondly, the features of Corel WordPerfect in 1987 are different to features in Google Docs 2009.  Collaborative editing with access level restrictions, online access, mobile support, web site integration, etc.   These haven’t been there in 1987.  Whether your Aunt is using them or not – that’s something else.  There are people who do.

Thirdly, the justification that exists for such a complication in technology stack is not for the Aunt, but for other people – often those in the technology industry.  Money, for example.  Go back to that original article and look at the diagrams.  Now, replace those vertical arrow comments with “Amount of money to be made/earned”, and you’ll have your own justification.  There are thousands upon thousands of people feeding on each layer of that technology cake.  The thicker the layer, and the more layers you have, the more people can feed of it.  I don’t like the way it goes, but on the other hand, I’m one of those feeding of that cake.

Fourthly, well, don’t mind the definitions, but Web OS is what you want for your Aunt.  Because in 1987 you had only one Aunt who was using a computer, so you had the luxury of time for going there and installing and upgrading software, fixing all those problems she was having, and explaining to her how to do things better.  In 2009 each of us has dozens of Aunts that need this help.  Going around doing all those little favours is getting time consuming.  So, giving her a small laptop with just a browser in it and the rest of the software from inside that browser  is an awesome option.

And I can go on and on about this …