Classic Programmer Paintings

Classic Programmer Paintings is a hilarious resource with classic paintings featured with modern captions from the programming world.

"Gentle technical discussion on IRC channel", Francisco Goya, Oil on canvas, 1814
“Gentle technical discussion on IRC channel”,
Francisco Goya, Oil on canvas, 1814

Well worth adding the RSS feed to your geek humor collection…

Found via Andrey Vystavkin.

What is a Senior Developer?

I’ve been hiring, firing, and working with developers of all sorts for the last couple of decades.  In those years, I realized that each developer is very unique – their strong and weak sides, knowledge gaps, working rhythm, social interaction, communication abilities, etc.  But regardless of how unique each developer is, it is often useful to group them into expertise levels, like junior and senior.  Companies do that for a variety of reasons – billing rates, expectations, training required, responsibility, etc.

And this is where things get tricky.  One needs a good definition of what a senior developer is (other definitions can be derived from this one one too).  There is no standard definition that everybody agrees upon, so each one has their own.

I mostly consider a senior developer to be self-sufficient and self-motivated.  It’s somebody who has the expertise to solve, or find ways of solving any kind of technical problems.  It’s also someone who can see the company’s business needs and issues, and can find work to do, even if nothing has been recently assigned to him.  A senior developer would also provide guidance and mentorship to the junior teammates. I’ve also came to believe that people with the real expertise have no problem discussing complex technical issues in simple terms, but that’s just a side note.

Anyway, recently, I came across this very short blog post, which sent me a spree of pages, charts, and discussions:

Because of this “What is a senior developer?” conversation on Reddit, I am reminded of the Construx Professional Development Ladders, as mentioned to me long ago by Alejandro Garcia Fernandez. Here is a sample ladder for developers.

The original article for the Reddit discussion – “The Conjoined Triangles of Senior-Level Development” is absolutely brilliant.  In the beginning it provides a chart of the conjoined triangles of senior-level development, which reflects my definition and understanding:

conjoined

But it doesn’t stop there. It dives deeper into the problem, and, eventually features this Venn diagram:

venn

.. and more.  By now, I’ve read the article three times, but I keep coming back to it – it just makes me think and rethink over and over again.  Once it settles in my head a bit, I’ll look deeper into the Professional Development Ladder and it’s example application to the senior developer.

Overall, this is a very thought provoking bunch of links.

Setting up NAT on Amazon AWS

When it comes to Amazon AWS, there are a few options for configuring Network Address Translation (NAT).  Here is a brief overview.

NAT Gateway

NAT Gateway is a configuration very similar to Internet Gateway.  My understanding is that the only major difference between the NAT Gateway and the Internet Gateway is that you have the control over the external public IP address of the NAT Gateway.  That’ll be one of your allocated Elastic IPs (EIPs).  This option is the simplest out of the three that I considered.  If you need plain and simple NAT – than that’s a good one to go for.

NAT Instance

NAT Instance is a special purpose EC2 instance, which is configured to do NAT out of the box.  If you need anything on top of plain NAT (like load balancing, or detailed traffic monitoring, or firewalls), but don’t have enough confidence in your network and system administration skills, this is a good option to choose.

Custom Setup

If you are the Do It Yourself guy, this option is for you.   But it can get tricky.  Here are a few things that I went through, learnt and suffered through, so that you don’t have to (or future me, for that matter).

Let’s start from the beginning.  You’ve created your own Virtual Private Cloud (VPC).  In that cloud, you’ve created two subnets – Public and Private (I’ll use this for example, and will come back to what happens with more).  Both of these subnets use the same routing table with the Internet Gateway.  Now you’ve launched an EC2 instance into your Public subnet and assigned it a private IP address.  This will be your NAT instance.  You’ve also launched another instance into the Private subnet, which will be your test client.  So far so good.

This instance will be used for translating internal IP addresses from the Private subnet to the external public IP address.  So, we, obviously, need an external IP address.  Let’s allocate an Elastic IP and associate it with the EC2 instance.  Easy peasy.

Now, we’ll need to create another routing table, using our NAT instance as the default gateway.  Once created, this routing table should be associated with our Private subnet.  This will cause all the machines on that network to use the NAT instance for any external communications.

Let’s do a quick side track here – security.  There are three levels that you should keep in mind here:

  • Network ACLs.  These are Amazon AWS access control lists, which control the traffic allowed in and out of the networks (such as our Public and Private subnets).  If the Network ACL prevents certain traffic, you won’t be able to reach the host, irrelevant of the host security configuration.  So, for the sake of the example, let’s allow all traffic in and out of both the Public and Private networks.  You can adjust it once your NAT is working.
  • Security Groups.  These are Amazon AWS permissions which control what type of traffic is allowed in or out of the network interface.  This is slightly confusing for hosts with the single interface, but super useful for machines with multiple network interfaces, especially if those interfaces are transferred between instances.  Create a single Security Group (for now, you can adjust this later), which will allow any traffic in from your VPC range of IPs, and any outgoing traffic.  Assign this Security Group to both EC2 instances.
  • Host firewall.  Chances are, you are using a modern Linux distribution for your NAT host.  This means that there is probably an iptables service running with some default configuration, which might prevent certain access.  I’m not going to suggest to disable it, especially on the machine facing the public Internet.  But just keep it in mind, and at the very least allow the ICMP protocol, if not from everywhere, then at least from your VPC IP range.

Now, on to the actual NAT.  It is technically possible to setup and use NAT on the machine with the single network interface, but you’d probably be frowned upon by other system and network administrators.  Furthermore, it doesn’t seem to be possible on the Amazon AWS infrastructure.  I’m not 100% sure about that, but I’ve spent more time than I had to figure this out and I failed miserably.

The rest of the steps would greatly benefit from a bunch of screenshots and step-by-step click through guides, which I am too lazy to do.  You can use this manual, as a base, even though it covers a slightly different, more advanced setup.  Also, you might want to have a look at CentOS 7 instructions for NAT configuration, and the discussion on the differences between SNAT and MASQUERADE.

We’ll need a second network interface.  You can create a new Network Interface with the IP in your Private subnet and attach it to the NAT instance.  Here comes a word of caution:  there is a limit on how many network interfaces can be attached to EC2 instance.  This limit is based on the type of the instance.   So, if you want to use a t2.nano or t2.micro instance, for example, you’d be limited to only two interfaces.  That’s why I’ve used the example with two networks – to have a third interface added, you’d need a much bigger instance, like t2.medium. (Which is a total overkill for my purposes.)

Now that you’ve attached the second interface to your EC2 instance, we have a few things to do.  First, you need to disable “Source/Destination Check” on the second network interface.  You can do it in your AWS Console, or maybe even through the API (I haven’t gone that deep yet).

It is time to adjust the configuration of our EC2 instance.  I’ll assume CentOS 7 Linux distribution, but it’d be very easy to adjust to whatever other Linux you are running.

Firstly, we need to configure the second network interface.  The easiest way to do this is to copy /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth0 file into /etc/sysconfig/network-scripts/ifcfg-eth1, and then edit the eth1 one file changing the DEVICE variable to “eth1“.  Before you restart your network service, also edit /etc/sysconfig/network file and add the following: GATEWAYDEV=eth0 .  This will tell the operating system to use the first network interface (eth0) as the gateway device.  Otherwise, it’ll be sending things into the Private network and things won’t work as you expect them.  Now, restart the network service and make sure that both network interfaces are there, with correct IPs and that your routes are fine.

Secondly, we need to tweak the kernel for the NAT job (sounds funny, doesn’t it?).  Edit your /etc/sysctl.conf file and make sure it has the following lines in it:

# Enable IP forwarding
net.ipv4.ip_forward=1
# Disable ICMP redirects
net.ipv4.conf.all.accept_redirects=0
net.ipv4.conf.all.send_redirects=0
net.ipv4.conf.eth0.accept_redirects=0
net.ipv4.conf.eth0.send_redirects=0
net.ipv4.conf.eth1.accept_redirects=0
net.ipv4.conf.eth1.send_redirects=0

Apply the changes with sysctl -p.

Thirdly, and lastly, configure iptables to perform the network address translation.  Edit /etc/sysconfig/iptables and make sure you have the following:

*nat
:PREROUTING ACCEPT [48509:2829006]
:INPUT ACCEPT [33058:1879130]
:OUTPUT ACCEPT [57243:3567265]
:POSTROUTING ACCEPT [55162:3389500]
-A POSTROUTING -s 10.0.0.0/16 -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
COMMIT

Adjust the IP range from 10.0.0.0/16 to your VPC range or the network that you want to NAT.  Restart the iptables service and check that everything is hunky-dory:

  1. The NAT instance can ping a host on the Internet (like 8.8.8.8).
  2. The NAT instance can ping a host on the Private network.
  3. The host on the Private network can ping the NAT instance.
  4. The host on the Private network can ping a host on the Internet (like 8.8.8.8).

If all that works fine, don’t forget to adjust your Network ACLs, Security Groups, and iptables to whatever level of paranoia appropriate for your environment.  If something is still not working, check all of the above again, especially for security layers, IP addresses (I spent a coupe of hours trying to find the problem, when it was the IP address typo – 10.0.0/16 – not the most obvious of things), network masks, etc.

Hope this helps.

504 Gateway Timeout error on Nginx + FastCGI (php-fpm)

504

“504 Gateway Timeout” error is a very common issue when using Nginx with PHP-FPM.  Usually, that means that it took PHP-FPM longer to generate the response, than Nginx was willing to wait for.  A few possible reasons for this are:

  • Nginx timeout configuration uses very small values (expecting the responses to be unrealistically fast).
  • The web server is overloaded and takes longer than it should to process requests.
  • The PHP application is slow (maybe due to database behind it being or slow).

There is plenty advice online on how to troubleshoot and sort these issues.  But when it comes down to increasing the timeouts, I found such advice to be scattered, incomplete, and often outdated.  This page, however, has a good collection of tweaks.  They are:

  1. Increase PHP maximum execution time in /etc/php.inimax_execution_time = 300
  2. Increase PHP-FPM request terminate timeout in the pool configuration (/etc/php-fpm.d/www.conf): request_terminate_timeout = 300
  3. Increase Nginx FastCGI read timeout (in /etc/nginx/nginx.conf): fastcgi_read_timeout 300;

Also, see this Stack Overflow thread for more suggestions.

P.S.: while you are sorting out your HTTP errors, have a quick look at HTTP Status Dogs, which I blogged about a while back.